Consistency please!
Racism 'not behind mosque attack'
'Police have a suspect but say there was no racist or religious vendetta behind swastikas and the number 666 being daubed on a Lower Hutt mosque.'
So how come when a mosque is vandalised it is not classified as a racist attack? But when a synagogue is vandalised it is always a racist attack. Could it be that if the mosque attack was racist then it could only mean that the finger could maybe point to the jews as they are both in a very bitter conflict with much blood spilt.
Check out the news links below and think for your self.
Nazi signs painted on mosque - http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/0,2106,3748625a11,00.html
Racism 'not behind mosque attack' - http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/story.cfm?c_id=1&ObjectID=10393780
'Police have a suspect but say there was no racist or religious vendetta behind swastikas and the number 666 being daubed on a Lower Hutt mosque.'
So how come when a mosque is vandalised it is not classified as a racist attack? But when a synagogue is vandalised it is always a racist attack. Could it be that if the mosque attack was racist then it could only mean that the finger could maybe point to the jews as they are both in a very bitter conflict with much blood spilt.
Check out the news links below and think for your self.
Nazi signs painted on mosque - http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/0,2106,3748625a11,00.html
Racism 'not behind mosque attack' - http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/story.cfm?c_id=1&ObjectID=10393780
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home